In which I take some inspiration from The Ashes …

The Saturday papers are full of good news from Downunder. The joy of waking each morning to hear of more overnight success has been a real fillip in these dog days of winter. And for any cricket fan who has endured our miserable tours in Australia for the last quarter century the success is especially sweet. It’s just a shame that I can’t seem to find any Australian to have a face-to-face gloat with.

What England’s elite cricketers seem to have pulled off is the Holy Grail of committed sportsmen and women everywhere: consistency. That’s consistency of excellence not mediocrity (the FA’s specialism). I’m fascinated by sport particularly how individuals with similar sorts of gifts end up performing at wildly different levels. And how and why successful teams and sporting brands replicate their success over long periods of time. Why, for example, is Michael Schumacher a multi-times world champion in F1 whilst his competitors are unable to match that achievement.

My ‘home’ sport is rugby union. So I have followed England’s journey since winning the Rugby World Cup in 2003. A dismal story that demonstrates that sometimes the only way when you are at the top really is down. It’s a story that Australian cricket authorities would do well to heed.

A year or so ago I read a book by an american journalist called Malcolm Gladwell. The book is Outliers: The story of success. Gladwell looks at successful and unsuccessful people to identify why there is such a difference in outcomes. Of course much of the explanation is what you would expect: luck; family; and so on. But one factor he alighted on is what he called the 10,000 hour rule.

Simply put he said it took around 20 hours a week of practice for 10 years before achieving excellence. Obviously it’s all a bit more complicated than that but the central message struck home for me. It takes application and time to produce success that is anything more than transient. A message that seems perfectly obvious to all but owners of football clubs.

I remembered the Gladwell book on hearing some of the England players talking about their success. Of course they talked about ‘execution on the field’ which seemed a brutally accurate phrase given what they had done to Australia. But they also talked about preparation. The hard work and sheer graft they had put into being absolutely ready from the very first moment of each match. The 10,000 hours.

Thinking again about Gladwell’s rule I’ve concluded two things. One obvious and one that I’d lost a little sight of. The obvious lesson is that success in job-hunting or starting a business will depend on preparation and application (sorry about that pun). Showing anyone thinking of employing you that it’s the obvious thing to do and not the greatest risk they are ever likely to take.

The less obvious message for me is that after 20 (not 10) years full-time in my professional niche I am actually pretty good at what I do. If I’m convinced about that – despite the knock of being made redundant – I should be more convincing to those I want to hire me.

Time to hit the job-hunt gym.

Advertisements

About redundantpublicservant

A redundant UK public servant looking for work, sharing his experiences and providing a space for others to do the same.
This entry was posted in 2011, excellence, job hunting, success, The Ashes and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to In which I take some inspiration from The Ashes …

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention In which I take some inspiration from The Ashes … | A redundant public servant's blog -- Topsy.com

  2. Mean Mr Mustard says:

    Just wondering if Malcolm Gladwell took truly representative samples for successful people? One McCartney worth a billion or so, two in successful groups with five year commercial runs, one guy who had a one-hit wonder twenty years ago which still brings in nice royalties, four unknown session musicians making a steady wage, two hundred in working pub bands, one thousand who can play their chosen instrument reasonably well, but don’t make any money from it, ten thousand struggling to learn, and forty thousand who tried and gave up years ago.

    At least the prospect of turning a modest coin in some gainful employ isn’t as asymetric as my made up music industry example. Yet.

    Was it Gladwell who suggested the way to that extreme success was in being able to replicate and sell your work to many customers? Even if you’re the best in your field, if you can only serve one person at a time, there’s a limit to how far you can go. The leading edge financial innovators call it ‘leveraging’…

  3. Pingback: Being exposed | PRinHR

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s